Why some societies drive on the right side of the road – basic economics perspective

•September 18, 2009 • Leave a Comment

In our world today, we have many things which differ between societies but one thing which holds constant is humans have to be able to travel. But why has it evolved that some societies drive on the right side of the road and others on the left side? It turns out that just about two-thirds of the world drives on the right side of the road. In the past most everyone traveled on the left-side of the road. Reason being, most people are right handed. Back in feudal times, a right handed swordsman preferred to keep his scabbard on his left side and also mounted horses from the left due to this. Travel from the left side of the road would be easier because of the lowered risk of being hit while mounting, as well as keeping the his scabbard out of the way of traffic. This being said, it does not give attribute to the reasons why most of the world drives on the right side of the road. This can be traced back to the late 1700′s where people first began hauling large farm products on huge wagons which were pulled by horses. These huge wagons did not have places for the driver to sit, so being forced to sit on the horses he chose the left rear horse so he kept his right hand free to lash the team.  Since he was sitting on the left side he preferred everyone to pass on his left so that he could keep his eye on the wagon wheels, therefore he would drive on the right side of the road.

At this point, road systems begin to work efficiently so that they are performing in a way that generates the maximum desired output for given inputs with available technology.  These societies evolved to give a higher output with the same inputs, more or less giving the large wagons the right of way.  By doing this, the transaction costs are reduced which would have been affected by any hardships and costs incurred while traveling. The Coase Theorem, states that when trade in an externality is possible and there are no transaction costs, bargaining will lead to an efficient outcome regardless of the initial allocation of property rights. Meaning that if a government decides not to adopt driving on the right side a negative externality that exists, the costs of transportation is higher. These costs will be passed on to the customers, giving them greater incentive to home produce, which in turn gives the government less of a chance to gain tax dollars.  Therefore, both parties benefit without transaction cost leading to efficiency.

Does size of the a college football stadium affect wins?

•September 5, 2009 • Leave a Comment

So recently I was in a debate with a non-sec fan, which led me to wonder.  Is there a correlation between victories in college football and the size of the stadium that they play in?  Maybe, maybe not.  Is there any way to 100% prove that the size of the stadium relates to wins? No, but it should be interesting to see the results.

In the SEC we have my beloved bulldogs, playing in the beautiful Sanford Stadium which has a capacity of 92,756.  But under Mark Richt’s leadership, we actually have a better record on the road (30-as of tonight, before the Oklahoma State game) even though we own the 6th largest stadium in the land.  But all in all, the  average SEC  stadium has an capacity of 77,213 (not including Arkansas’ second stadium, necessary? I think not.)

Average capacity by conference

After I calculated the results as seen above, I was actually very surprised with the results. I figured that the SEC would be at the top and the Big East at the bottom, but Big 12 second to last? Unexpected to say the least.

Does the size of the stadium affect wins?

Home Stats by conference

This data shows that in the last 5 years the Big 12, which has the one of the smallest stadiums on average, has the best home win percentage.  Not to discount these home wins, the Big 12 also plays some of the hardest home opponents (by win %).   I believe that this shows that the size of the stadium does add any extra ability to win a game. It is possible that once a stadium reaches a certain size, the noise added by fans is negligible at best.  I believe that it is fair to conclude that past wins (success of program) affect the size of the stadium much more than the stadium affects the wins.

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.